Governance

Governance & Ethics

The Global Institute of Behavior operates under a formal governance framework designed to ensure integrity, independence, and accountability across all aspects of its certification activities. This page describes the structure of our governance, our Code of Ethics, and the process by which concerns are investigated.

Governance Structure

The Institute is governed by a Board of Governors composed of individuals with expertise in behavioral science, professional education, and organizational governance. The Board is responsible for strategic oversight, policy approval, and the integrity of the certification framework.

The Executive Director is responsible for day-to-day operations and reports to the Board. The Executive Director does not hold a vote on Board decisions affecting certification standards or disciplinary matters, maintaining separation between operational and governance functions.

Independence and Conflict of Interest

GIB operates as an independent certifying body. The Institute does not deliver training programs and maintains structural separation from approved training organizations. Board and committee members are required to disclose conflicts of interest prior to decisions in which they have a material interest, and to recuse themselves from such decisions.

No Board member may hold a financial interest in, or directorial role with, any approved training organization while serving on the Board.

Governance Principles

Code of Ethics

All GIB credential holders agree to uphold the Institute's Code of Ethics as a condition of certification and renewal. The Code governs professional conduct in the application of behavioral science skills and establishes boundaries of responsible practice.

The Code of Ethics addresses:

GIB certifications are professional development credentials. Credential holders must not represent their qualification as a government accreditation, clinical diagnosis, or operational authority of any kind. Behavioral observation is one evidence-informed tool among many; credential holders are trained to apply it with appropriate professional judgment, not to make definitive determinations of intent or deception.

Complaints and Disciplinary Process

The Institute maintains a formal process for receiving and investigating complaints regarding potential breaches of the Code of Ethics by credential holders or approved training organizations.

How to submit a complaint: Complaints should be submitted in writing to the Ethics & Professional Conduct Committee via the Institute's registrar. Complaints must identify the credential holder or organization concerned, describe the alleged breach, and provide any supporting information. Anonymous complaints may be considered at the Committee's discretion.

Investigation process:

Sanctions available: Remediation requirement, formal caution, suspension of certification, or withdrawal of certification, depending on the severity of the finding.

Appeals: Any party may appeal a Board decision within 30 days of notification. Appeals are reviewed by an independent panel that does not include any member who participated in the original investigation.

Scope-of-Practice Notice

GIB credentials are professional development qualifications issued by an independent certifying body. They are not accredited by, affiliated with, or recognized by any government agency, military branch, law enforcement authority, or intelligence body. GIB certifications do not confer government authority, security clearance, operational authorization, or clinical diagnostic authority of any kind.

Behavioral observation skills developed through GIB-approved training and assessed in GIB examinations support structured, evidence-informed professional practice. No behavioral observation method has been established as a reliable independent indicator of deception. Credential holders must not represent their skills as providing the ability to definitively detect lies or determine intent.